Why isn't the FBI raiding all Silicon Valley companies like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok, Reddit, Google, Yahoo, YouTube, Disqus, Wikipedia for censoring the World through their Ban cartel violating the constitution freespeech laws?
10.06.2025 00:20
Lemme make this simple - Freedom of the press belongs to the person who owns the press. You don’t like what a particular press (the social media you reference above is the press in this case) does, start your own and you make the rules.
They have not violated the U.S. Constitution and freedom of speech laws. Dunno about other countries.
Should newspapers be forced to print every letter ...
Pacers defeat Knicks in 6 games, advance to NBA Finals to face Thunder - NBC News
Restrictions of course apply. See Supreme Court rulings on what can be restricted, i.e. child porn, inciting to violence and a couple of others.
Government owned companies are also covered by this, but these companies must allow speech the company may not agree with.
Companies that are privately owned, owned by stockholders, etc. are also covered by this. These companies cannot be forced to provide space or a platform for speech they do not agree with. This is freedom of speech. I realize you may disagree.
Anycubic has yet another sale happening, and the 3D printer I own is $200 off - Creative Bloq
What arguments like this fail to recognize is 1A means you have the right to keep your damfool mouth shut. 1A means you cannot be forced to say anything, a right backed up by 5A. 1A and 5A as they apply to speech prevent government from forcing you to say something AND stop government from not letting you speak.